Month: August 2016

Permanent sexual arousal

Before, we lived surrounded by 20 to 50 people genetically close. Now, in the cities, there are easily 10,000 people. It is impossible to walk a few hours in a city without meeting a large number of desirable people of the other sex (and sometimes, we are close to them).

Physical desires are always excited (even if it is often unconscious) but will only rarely be satisfied. We live in a very frustrating environment.

Clothing helps avoiding it a little bit but obviously not enough: it hides some visible skin therefore mitigates some excitement but it allows on the other hand to bluff and hide flaws, which can have the opposite effect. It is double-edged. Clothes also have the power to make a girl look sexier than she is… (but do not worry that once naked and the male aroused, he will fuck her all the same!)

It also forces to confront your own misery with the success of some others (especially if you are alone and sees in the street ugly guys with beautiful girls). This can lead to tantrums and outbursts.

 

Differences of interpretation

The fact that men interpret a smile as an advance when it is nothing, consider the girls dressed sexy as sluts, or that rapes are widespread (increase in the number of rape on a sample of individuals) is a legacy of our evolutionary psychology.

This is not a reason to tolerate all that shit (especially not rape). But society is such that people tend to go crazy. So, it’s up to us to control ourselves and to give a good education to our children.

I sincerely believe that the game can help men to be less “hungry for sex” and so more attractive (which will seduce women): they will fuck more it will be beneficial to the whole society.

We should not forget that sex is, in our society, a taboo subject that fascinates and attracts us all… but secretly (just see the number of songs and films that talk about it)! Fucking for fun and not to perpetuate the species (through contraceptives) could change that. But in fact, women are still fine little plaster saints and men are still sex-starved. And women in particular, have so much their ass between two chairs that they often react aggressively to men’s approaches. This is not a behavior of healthy people, you will agree. We live in a stressful society and this anxiety causes people to be always more careful and not to live their lives… but to suffer their lives.

It is true that it is really better to become alcoholic that being a woman who loves sex, right? Well, in today’s society is better seen by many people. But where are we going?

It would be good that our brains evolve rapidly to take contraceptives into account so that fewer people are frustrated (thus potentially dangerous). This mixture of bad faith and biological dissatisfaction seems to be a dead end road leading right to the overuse of drugs and alcohol (everyone needs an outlet). Video games are also a distraction to me: after a certain age, we should prefer “hunting” (I allow myself this term because we all have an instinct of hunter-gatherers) girls than Pokémon!

 

Feminism

One can read in an article in The Futurist called The Misandry Bubble « The Western World has quietly become a civilization that undervalues men and overvalues women, where the state forcibly transfers resources from men to women creating various perverse incentives for otherwise good women to conduct great evil against men and children, and where male nature is vilified but female nature is celebrated. This is unfair to both genders, and is a recipe for a rapid civilizational decline and displacement, the costs of which will ultimately be borne by a subsequent generation of innocent women, rather than men, as soon as 2020.»

Feminism is in fact not just a weapon of intra-sexual competition but also a filter that allowed women to select men who are dominant enough to do not submit to it. Now all the propaganda induced effects, including this one : it prevents the development of these men they are looking for.

Currently, the repressed desire of men is used to sell (entrances in clubs, more and more expensive, for example).

 

The Islamic veil

This phenomenon is explained by sexual competition. It’s simple: it distinguishes between “Madonnas” and “Sluts.” The veil is even forbidden to prostitutes and slaves.

Women do not want to look like whores, men are not marrying whores, men do not bring all their resources to whores.

The most beautiful women can say they do not care about looking like sluts, they do not need to run after men, it is men who desire them, and men love sluts. But that does not matter: there are far more average women than hot women, so the first ones have quickly reined in the seconds. This is the law of numbers: democracy.

In addition, the veil prevents men from being too excited at the sight of women… and some wagging tongues say that it allows ugly women to find a husband since men do not see them. It makes sense but, in practice, that would surprise me a bit.

In any case, what is certain is that if we do not see the women of our neighbors: no jealousy!

 

Monogamy

It is a model that was based more on the desires and needs of women than men.

Today we also live in a repeating pattern of monogamy (changing partners but often only one at a time). The consequence ? Significant tensions between different social groups.

However, Wikipedia is more optimistic than me (this is appreciable but it seems that there is a part of propaganda because monogamy can lead to frustration which always has negative consequences)

Monogamy is a legal regime allowing a man to marry only one woman, and a woman only one man. The other way is called polygamy.

According to research, it would appear that the human has a lot of receptors on two substances released during sex. This phenomenon would make him an inherently monogamous animal.

Approximately 85% of past human societies for which there are historical data seem to have allowed men to have more than one wife in a polygamous marriage. One might empirically think that the increased wealth of the elites should encourage more polygamous marriages. But the trend is opposite: monogamous marriage has spread across Europe and more recently in the world, even among the elite, even if wealth gaps have grown. An academic study published in 2012 used the criminological data available to compare polygamous and monogamous societies. According to the authors, they suggest that monogamous cultures have less rape, kidnapping, murder and child abuse, and other crimes than polygamous societies.

The institutionalization of monogamy seems to bring more net benefits for society in particular because without it many men are forced to celibacy with less hope to live with a woman. They would then be more likely to abuse and antisocial behavior; The study raised the hypothesis that institutionalized monogamy is associated with a cultural model best suited to the modern world, reducing intrasexual competition among young people, and reducing therefore the crime rate (in terms of rape, murder, assault, theft fraud) while reducing the age difference between spouses, fertility and gender inequality and moving the efforts of men looking for a wife to more paternal investment, and improved economic productivity. Peter Richerson believes that by increasing the degree of relationship within the household, the normative monogamy effectively reduces intra-household conflict, leading to fewer child neglect, less abuse, accidental death and homicide.

 

Is everyone entitled to health care and love ?

The popular belief is that everyone has a soul mate. But evolutionary psychology tells us that bad genes should be excluded from genetic heritage.

It’s contradictory !

Some people should not breed, according to natural selection. Besides, a long time ago, many children did not survive.

Today, medical advances are such that genes that would once have been evacuated are still there and reproduce. On the other hand, this same progress is the source of many disease because of stress and junk food, for example. So it’s the least society can do, taking care of us!

I am neither for nor against the fact that we treat ill people, I was happy when I felt not good in my life. But what I mean is that nature does not want it and suffers. Indeed, there are disastrous consequences: a dumbing down of the population and an overcrowding which hurt the planet.

Let’s think about it…

Extract from : Evopsy and Seduction

All that has been said so far implies that what turns on every woman “100% woman” is determined by genetics.

The game has therefore applied to understand all this and to use evolutionary psychology to teach us what levers make respond women “programmed” as women.

However, as we have seen, some seek female characteristics in men. Just as some guys will be reassured by manly characteristics in a woman. Psychology and placement on the scale from “100% woman” to “100% man” will bring individual nuances in our analysis. But on average, men have more success by adopting a rather manly behavior and women by adopting a feminine behavior. It seems logical but many people have not yet integrated it (or have forgotten because of “feminism”)!

In summary, according to Evopsy, women are genetically programmed to look for men who have the best genes and which can ensure the survival of their offspring (strength, resources…) As for men, they look for women offering a good genetic resume for their offspring (beauty, health…)

Through a study of evolutionary psychology, we can get to reproduce the attractive attitudes and avoid those that communicate we’re not an attractive candidate.

A man with good attitudes also becomes as attractive to women as a girl who is a pure hottie would be attractive to us. She will as quickly as possible make a sorting out “pussies” with whom she will have a purely friendly relationship, and serious candidates for sex. This is natural and cannot be controlled! It is useless to blame her for that…

Just like it is useless to be mad to a man who does not wants to fuck a big sausage. This chick may be very nice but evolution does not care. It is uncompromising, contrary to what the Hollywood movies would like to make us believe.

We almost all have a potential to turn on girls because it is more a psychological than a physical matter. Culture and society blur their instinct (thanks you Walt Disney …) so the girls may not even consciously know what really pleases them in fact. That’s why it is not a good idea to ask a friend with whom it is platonic to tell you how to seduce. No more than it is advisable to read women’s magazines.

We’ve listed some characteristics that can make someone desirable (there are many others in the rest of the book). That said, people of the opposite sex will always have personal preferences out of our scope of influence.

For example, each woman has her own hierarchy of qualities she looks for in a man (e.g. social position > Confidence > beautiful physical appearance).

And even within this hierarchy, there are different hierarchies: the server of the hype club can be an alpha in the eyes of girls who give value to clubbing. He would be nothing for the girl who does not go in that club and does not care about people who drink alcool listening to electro. The drugged will like a dealer or a rich guy who will pay her some powder. The sportive woman will like her ski instructor or yoga teacher, etc.

Most people know from adolescence where they stand in the hierarchy of reproduction: just a few trials during adolescence are enough to find it and then targeting at this level. It leaves traces!

Personally, I did not have much success when I was young and now I still wonder how I got there. You can climb in the hierarchy of reproduction but you will have to fight (do not take it too literally) against yourself and against others.

This is what is called inter-sexual selection, which corresponds to variable selection criteria from one person to another in the eyes of the opposite sex. Another example: a woman can give more importance in selecting certain attributes such as leadership, a tall man, his eye color, his impudence… While another may prefer the quality of speech, humor… the girl’s education level can also influence the hierarchy of her preferences!

Finally, there are issues of perspective that comes into play: a politician like François Hollande is a dominant in Paris but if one day he finds himself lost in the jungle, he would be nothing in the eyes of a savage girl.

I hope you have better understood why seduction is such a delicate area, hard to study (many variables), and why the game works through the logic of large numbers (most women are programmed to love Men).

Extract from : Evopsy and Seduction

Sexual selection started a long time ago and happened on the very long term: our brain has been optimized for a world that no longer exists. And had not enough time to adapt.

We must assimilate this notion that we have already mentioned, the “Mismatch” : our brains date of the Stone Age, so it was not selected to live in today’s environment: overcrowding, sharing labor, etc.

We are currently facing an unprecedented sexual context, far from what our ancestors have known: reliable contraceptives, infertility treatments, artificial insemination, dating sites, sperm banks, AIDS … The prehistoric brains of men and women did not know condoms, for example! And yet, it changes everything, sexually speaking!

We face these new conditions armed of old strategies that have worked at different times and in environments disappeared forever. The modern human has been shaped by a world that had nothing to do with the modern world and the change of the environment was not slow enough to allow a deep adaptation.

Fortunately, this book will focus on what it is good to keep in this programming but also and especially what it is counter-productive to keep. Basically, I invite you here to think for yourself about certain things you do or refrain. Why ? How? Is it really in your best interest to do that?

Extract from : Evopsy and Seduction

We must consider that this expression is always implied in this book and is here to show the boundaries of this knowledge and to remember the caution that must be preserved when it comes to its interpretation.

For example, when we say that being tall and muscular offers a reproductive advantage, we imply “all things being equal”.

In real life, the benefit is not necessarily very obvious. First, maybe that the guy who has this combination will never dare to approach a girl or is impotent, which does not question the principle of the benefit but its realization for the individual.

Then maybe that this genetic combination has other consequences going against the reproduction of its bearer: for example, if, after a disaster, the last girl on earth is traumatized for one reason or another and fear tall men (do not laugh, I know some) she will not consider the handsome giant survivor and will prefer an opportunistic guy like me. In this particular case, it is obviously not an advantage anymore: the principle is challenged and the genes of this man who seemed nevertheless advantaged would disappear.

The human sciences are sciences like others who seek to define general laws based on variables.

The only problem is that these laws are far more numerous in the human sciences than in most disciplines, and most are difficult to quantify or even undiscovered.

This is the opposite approach that was chosen in Evopsy: instead of trying to list the variables, the researcher will consider those he knows and act like if all the others were unchanged.

This is the meaning of “all things being equal”.

Extract from : Evopsy and Seduction

It should be understood, on the other hand, that the differences between men and women are not absolute.

It is easy to find counter-examples: many women are taller than many men (Big Up to Jamel Debbouze and Melissa Theuriau) although on AVERAGE, women are smaller than men.

These differences correspond to an “archetype”, but it is only guidance. There are also men with women’s intuition. In other words, each one of us is somewhere on the scale of “100% man” to “100% woman” but nobody is on the extremities. We all have some fragments of the code of the other sex in us, even if it does not dominate. Most of us are not totally sexed, we are a kind of mixture of feminine nature and masculine nature. What you will read is not an absolute truth but is true in general cases.

Extract from : Evopsy and Seduction

All our senses and all our daily observations show us that men and women are different. The most visible differences are clearly reflected at the physical level: primary and secondary sexual characteristics.

Intellectual differences are also notable. For example, the woman has a verbal intelligence far superior to the man: she will better understand the different meaning of a sentence. She talks more and not with the same objectives: it is found in every society that have been studied (universality of the influence of genes). Feminine intuition usually allows her to better understand the relationships between people: she will know very quickly who tries to seduce who, what is the emotional state of a couple, while that man will often not “see the matrix “.

In contrast, men are better in terms of visual-spatial intelligence: they dominate in tests asking to reconstruct an image or reading maps.

However, do not make me say what I did not say. We are not that different: we are more similar than different. One could compare the man and the woman with both word processing software each with special characteristics (such as Word and Open Office). Our similarities constitute 97% of our human nature: men and women have two legs, two arms, a body, a head, and our lives revolve around the same dimensions: personal, relational, professional and master. Our needs are essentially the same too: survival, to love and be loved, to flourish, to reproduce. Our fears too. In short, our brains have the same structures…

Men and women are similar but different. Not worse, nor better… just different!

The source of this difference is in our human nature, our genetic code, our atavism. All the humans share twenty-three pairs of chromosomes. Twenty-two pairs are identical: one, the sexual pair, is different.

The source of our differences lies also in our millions of years of evolution. The man always on the hunt, on guard, focused on his physical survival and the survival of his family, displaying ingenuity to stalk his prey, to do not get lost… All that makes a man and is etched in his nature.

The woman, often pregnant, living in the cave with the other women and children, having to learn how to live in a small space, anticipating potential danger, watching the fire, feeding her children from her body reserves, waiting for hunters to regain her strength, gathering all that is edible… all that makes a woman is etched in her nature.

The fairest conclusion is that men and women are not identical, they are complementary.

Extract from : Evopsy and Seduction